All too few girls consider engineering as a career,
and the profession is the poorer for it, as talented
individuals seek vocations elsewhere. But a new program
is in the works in the United States to attract young
women to engineering—and to keep them in the career.
Dubbed the Extraordinary Women Engineers Project, the
program is being driven by a nationwide coalition of
professional engineering societies, including the
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the IEEE,
and the National Academy of Engineering, as well as
universities and technology companies.
The program aims to make the general public,
especially girls, aware of the importance of engineering
in everyday life. It plans to release a book and a
television documentary on women in engineering in 2006
and 2007, respectively. It also plans to air radio shows
and to develop resources for guidance counselors,
teachers, and parents—people who influence girls as
they are making college and career decisions.
The Extraordinary Women Engineers Project, based in
Reston, Va., is the brainchild of Patricia D. Galloway,
past president of the ASCE, who herself needed a strong
streak of stubbornness to get teachers and some family
members to take seriously her junior-high school
aspirations to be an engineer. Later, during her career,
Galloway [see photo, "Engineering Champion"]
noticed that the number of practicing female civil
engineers was holding steady, even though women were
increasingly choosing the major in college, implying
that other women were leaving the fold.
Then, in 2001, she noticed another disturbing thing:
university enrollment of female engineering students was
going down. "I've been on a crusade since then," she
says. "We need [to know] why there are so few
women...provide a vehicle for women to go into
engineering, and [show them] that it's a cool thing to
do."
Today, 23 percent of all engineering graduates are
women, a much smaller percentage than those in medicine
and law, says Tom Price, a senior vice president at the
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering,
in White Plains, N.Y.; Price is on the Extraordinary
Women Engineers steering committee.
To increase that percentage, various organizations,
universities, and companies have already started
programs to encourage young women to choose engineering
careers. Included in this group are the Society of Women
Engineers, Ohio State University, Princeton University,
and IBM.
But the Extraordinary Women Engineers Project is
different. "It is more comprehensive," Price says. "It
starts with the basis that we don't know anything about
13-year-olds and suggests how we can build our program
on where they are, not where we think they should be."
To find out where the teens are, the program's
members have already begun the spadework, even though
the project won't be officially launched until early
next year. With a grant from the National Science
Foundation, in Arlington, Va., and the United
Engineering Foundation, in Mount Vernon, Va., members
interviewed and surveyed high school girls to assess
what is keeping them from engineering. Between June 2004
and January 2005, they conducted an online focus group
and an online survey, with 84 and 165 high school girls,
respectively, chosen from a national sample of students
representing a mix of ethnic backgrounds.
No one had ever talked to teenage girls about this
before, says Galloway, now CEO of the Nielsen-Wurster
Group Inc., an engineering and management consultancy in
Princeton, N.J. People had assumed that girls don't
choose engineering because of their perception that
engineers lead boring and isolated lives, but there had
been no real data to support that notion. The survey
found the assumption to be true. (The survey is now
available online at
http://www.engineeringwomen.org/pdf/EWEPFinal.pdf.)
It also showed that one reason girls overlook
engineering is that they want jobs that will make a
difference in the world by affecting poverty, health
care, and the environment. They choose professions such
as law, medicine, and biology, which they feel have more
potential to change society. "The way engineering is
projected nowadays, we don't emphasize that connection"
to society, says Linda Katehi, dean of engineering at
Purdue University, in West Lafayette, Ind., and an
advisory board member for the project.
What's more, a majority of girls don't understand
what engineers do. It's relatively easier to define what
doctors and lawyers do, Price says. Many survey
participants thought of engineers as having dull lives
and being stuck in cubicles all day—picture Dilbert,
the comic-strip character. They think engineering isn't
"cool," Katehi says, which makes it less acceptable to
peers.
Katehi believes that the project's flagship book will
challenge that view. Coming out next year, Women Engineers:
Extraordinary Stories of How They Changed Our
World contains richly illustrated biographies
of famous women engineers who've made a difference in
the profession, from the 1920s to the present.
Designed as a coffee-table book, it starts with the
example of the human body as a vehicle to describe women
in such fields as biomedical engineering and genetic
engineering, showing how they are participating in
important work being done in medicine, sports, and
agriculture. Role models range from 70-year-old ceramic
engineer Anna Fraker, who studied materials for surgical
implants, to 35-year-old Jennifer West, a biomedical
engineer who worked on a cancer treatment using
nanoparticles to burn out tumors.
The book then takes readers through aspects of daily
life, describing how engineering has affected the things
we use and enjoy every day. The wide-ranging discussion
covers household appliances, drinking water, music,
movies, the Internet, television, cars, and airplanes,
and finally space exploration, showing how women have
contributed to each of these areas. It also talks about
the engineers' hobbies and personal lives, contesting
the Dilbert stereotype.
The Extraordinary Women Engineers Project plans to
distribute the book to high school counselors and
teachers, and through them to students. It will also
send the book to counseling offices in engineering
schools. Later, a shorter version for parents and
families might be published, Katehi adds.
While the book and other educational materials are
aimed at changing the perception of engineering among
girls, they are targeting other audiences as well. A
crucial reason girls shun engineering is because they're
not encouraged to think about it. Teachers, parents, and
counselors "haven't got a clue what engineering is
about," says Price. As a result, when most girls choose
the profession, it's because, in part, they already know
someone in it. The project seeks to attract girls to
engineering who don't have that advantage—or the
stubbornness that Galloway had in junior high.