Taming The Grid
As an electric utility transmission system planner for
many years, I agree that it takes about 35 years for
everyone involved in a major blackout to be long gone
and their observations and conclusions long forgotten
["The Unruly Power Grid," August]. It's an old story:
those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
Here's the history: on 4 August 1961, a northeastern
Ohio electric utility's transmission system was shut
down three times in one day; on 14 August 2003 the
entire Northeastern United States had a blackout for
essentially the same reasons (including a lack of tree trimming).
Illustration: John Bower/Alamy
|
"It takes about 35 years for everyone involved in a
major blackout to be long gone and their conclusions
long forgotten" —Fred Sener
Load shedding would likely have prevented the August
shutdowns, but other things could be done before load
shedding to prevent or limit the blackout. Watts
generated on critical generators could be traded for
much needed vars [volt-amperes reactive], to maximize
power transmission, and the configuration of the network
could be changed by opening circuit breakers to force
power flows. Unfortunately, I have found none of these
actions even alluded to in any discussion of the blackouts.
Fred Sener fsen213@aol.com
The grid is not a natural phenomenon guided by
immutable equations, but a human creation with
controllable operating parameters. The banking industry
is arguably more complicated than the power grid—tens
of thousands of employees interact with tens of millions
of customers—yet no massive interruption of monetary
flow has occurred since the Great Depression. This
stability is achieved through competitive pressures and
through heavy government regulation and enforcement.
Since the electric power distribution grid is a
natural monopoly, competition cannot provide safeguards.
Strong regulation, however, with requirements for a
minimum spare generation capacity and systematic
improvements of the distribution infrastructure,
combined with the prosecution of price gouging through
system manipulation, would fundamentally change the
equations describing the grid and make its failure much
less likely.
Yakov Shkolnikov yshkolni@princeton.edu
Looking at back issues of IEEE Spectrum, I find that
articles relating to the power grid appear about once
every six months, while computers and bioengineering
appear in every issue. I also see a lack of interest by
both universities and power companies in research on the
grid and new production methods.
Judging by the ads for doctorates in the back of
Spectrum, the emphasis for electrical engineers is in
computers and bioengineering. What is needed is a push
by both utilities and the universities to show young EEs
that power also has a future for them.
William Lauterbach wclauterbach@earthlink.net
The article's list of blackout precautions, "Better
Backups for John Q. Public," lacks the most important
necessity for survival: water. Households should store
at least 1 gallon of potable water per person.
Well-cleaned jugs (preferably of glass) must be filled
to overflowing and tightly capped to remain safe for
several years.
Max J. Schindler
Boonton, N.J.
Color Confusion
"Coming Soon:Trillion-Color TV" [August] is confusing.
Any source of digital video, such as a DVD or a digital
cable channel, can specify a maximum number of possible
colors—up to 16.7 million. A display technology can
reduce that number but can never increase it. Genoa
Color Technologies' introduction of cyan and yellow
primary colors into a TV display can just stretch the
video source's colors over a wider range, which may or
may not have been present in the video's original
scenes. The article would have benefited from ignoring
the irrelevant number of colors and concentrating on the
wider gamut of colors that could be displayed.
Palmer Agnew palmeragnew@prodigy.net
Associate Editor Erico
Guizzo responds: Agnew's point is
well-taken: we could have been clearer in stating that
the display gets no more color data than is normal from
the video source. Rather, Genoa's system arbitrarily
creates additional color data based on the original
source's colors. The larger color gamut that results is
shown in the illustration as "Genoa's multiprimary color range."
Looking Backward
Robert W. Lucky's essay "Retrospective Organization"
[Reflections, July] brings back memories of math
classes. Theorems always seemed to be provable in the
most orderly fashion: theorem, lemma, lemma, corollary,
note, remark, proof, QED. As with Lucky's retrospective
creation of the organization chart, I always suspected
that the first "mathematiker" did the proof in a very
disorderly way: "Let's see, I'd like to prove that x
equals y, so what routes could I possibly follow
backward to do it?"
William J. Eccles Terre
Haute, Ind.
Readers are invited to comment on material published
in IEEE
Spectrum, and on matters of interest to
engineering and technology professionals. Contact:
Forum, IEEE
Spectrum, 3 Park Ave., 17th floor, New York,
NY 10016-5997, U.S.A.; fax, +1 212 419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.