Photo: J. Perlish
|
To judge from events in Iraq during the last several
years, insurgent groups are learning and adapting their
methods of attack much more quickly than U.S. coalition
forces can respond. Lawrence Husick, a Senior Fellow in
the U.S. Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Center on
Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, and Homeland Security, has
been looking at terrorist tactics and counterterrorism
responses, with a focus on how modern terrorists
leverage technology. In August, IEEE Spectrum
contributing editor Robert N. Charette spoke to Husick
about what he’s finding out.
SPECTRUM: How
are insurgent groups using the Internet to coordinate,
to learn, and to recruit?
HUSICK: I
tend to focus on al-Qaeda more than narco-terrorist
groups, Russian mobs, the Shining Path, or the ETA. I
generally consider those other groups criminal
organizations in the classic sense—that is, they are
moving money, they’re moving drugs, they’re doing
extortion, that kind of thing. Or they’re political in
the classic sense, namely they have a localized
political agenda, tied to a particular place.
Al-Qaeda doesn’t fit those molds. Al-Qaeda is, if you
will, the venture capitalists of Islamic terrorism.
Their job is not to be operational anymore, even if it
once was. Their job is to figure out a way to gain
leverage just like a venture capitalist: put a little
resource in for a large amount of bang out and co-opt
other people to be the operators, to be the planners, to
be the messengers and provide a variety of resources,
money, training, encouragement, and tradecraft.
They are not geographically tied, since their audience
is young, disaffected males in Islamic societies and
also lots of people in the West who they are looking to
radicalize. That is why you now have to deal with what’s
going on in places like Birmingham, London, Paris,
Marseilles, and Madrid, because there are substantial
indigenous Muslim populations there, whether they are
immigrants or children of immigrants, that are capable
of being radicalized.
And to a great extent al-Qaeda has tried to reach into
the United States with their message, but they have
largely been unsuccessful because they don’t understand
the difference between an American Muslim and a Muslim
who has roots in either the Middle or Far East. Many
American Muslims are people who converted to Islam while
in prison. It is a particular brand of affiliation.
Also, most American Muslims don’t speak Arabic, and that
is a real impediment.
The use of the Internet for propagandizing is
tremendous. It comes from a number of different places.
Al-Qaeda has an entire media affiliate that produces
branded videos and audios that are distributed
throughout the Net. A very popular method of
distributing them is to put them on a Web site for only
so long as it takes for that Web site to be crawled by
the Wayback Machine [see http://www.archive.org]; the
Wayback Machine then archives them, and then the Islamic
sites can point to the archived copy on the Wayback
Machine. This creates a permanent repository with a high
bandwidth. It is a very clever trick.
But there are lots of other hosts that they use for
their sites, including online file-serving hosts that
are pretty anonymous.
You’ll often find a blog site that is in Arabic that
contains pointers to multiple copies of the same videos
encoded in a dozen formats, from those you can load on
your phone to those you can watch in large-screen formats.
SPECTRUM: So
they are relatively technically savvy?
HUSICK: They
are really technically savvy. They are starting to shoot
in HD [high definition]. Most of them are editing their
video on Windows laptops, doing it in the field. Then
they’re taking a disc or USB stick with the video and
carrying that to an Internet café, and then uploading it
using an anonymous account.
So these videos are being shot on the battlefields of
Afghanistan, the battlefields of Iraq, and being
uploaded from these countries, as well as from Pakistan,
Lebanon, and Turkey.
SPECTRUM: How
else is al-Qaeda using the Internet?
HUSICK: At
the same time you are getting recruiting, and posting of
radical materials, they are also being pretty successful
in distributing pretty sophisticated tradecraft and
training. For instance, I have downloaded detailed
videos on how to construct a suicide vest.
SPECTRUM:
Explosives experts claim that many of the bomb recipes
on the Web don’t work. Have you seen al-Qaeda upgrade
its training materials?
HUSICK: They
stay ahead of us faster than we can respond,
particularly in IED technology. They are also getting
very good at using low-tech machine shops to build
pretty sophisticated rockets. Nothing is going to win
any prizes from the Department of Defense, but the stuff
is deadly. They don’t particularly care if it is clean
or if they blow up a couple of guys trying to get it right.
The tradecraft is crude. It all relies on sound
materials, and they’re doing a pretty good job of
outlining some very simple but very deadly attacks.
It is not just the hardware—it’s also the tactics for
employing IEDs that are being disseminated. They are
outlining more and more sophisticated types of IEDs,
more and more sophisticated ruses for how to choke traffic.
What we have seen in the past several months is that
they are getting much better on sequenced and timed
attacks: they set off a small bomb and then wait for the
rescue forces to arrive, and then they set off another one.
Our jammers are not very effective against IEDs
because the insurgents have learned how to adapt. They
are using a huge variety of cheaply available stuff.
Something that is coming, according to people I’ve
talked to in the theater, are Chinese-made wireless
doorbells. They’re sloppy as hell—they are AM
transmitters around 400 kilohertz—but they are really
hard to jam because their receivers have no selectivity
at all.
SPECTRUM: Was
al-Qaeda exploiting the Internet five years ago in any
way other than putting out videos?
HUSICK: I
think al-Qaeda has increased its use of the Internet at
roughly the same rate of penetration as seen in Western
societies. Five years ago it was less usual to find
people who would go directly to Google, rather than pick
up a copy of the yellow pages. Now it is pervasive.
Al-Qaeda has ridden the technology curve just like
everybody else.
Five years ago they were beginning to publish videos,
but they weren’t that good, and the bandwidth wasn’t
there. But now they have much better production values.
They have learned how to do much more artistic camera
work, and they have learned how to do much better
editing. They have co-opted people who are good English
speakers to do some of their voice-overs. They have done
some amazing title graphics worthy of Fox News.
Five years ago they were publishing newsletters that
looked like church newsletters. Now they’re doing things
that look like a full-blown magazine. They’re getting
better with desktop-publishing software.
They are getting better as the technology gets better,
riding that technology curve with everybody else.
SPECTRUM:
Have you seen any evidence that al-Qaeda is coordinating
its activities through the Net?
HUSICK: That
is really hard to track, in no small part because if
there is some coordination, I am convinced that they are
doing it in some very simple coded forms of
communications. I tend to believe they use signaling
methods more than anything else. The mere appearance of
a file on a download site triggers a prearranged kind of activity.
So I don’t think they are coordinating in the same way
you would think of a command and coordination system.
SPECTRUM: Do
you think al-Qaeda will start moving toward coordinating
activities more overtly?
HUSICK: You
would think so, but I doubt it. I tend to believe that
they are really focused on what they call the individual
duty of jihad. This is not the kind of thing that is
going to result in a grand hierarchical army scheme
where you’ve got some generals and other people really
in control and masterminding things.
I think it is going to be a very long war of attrition
in which the actions are going to be very difficult to
predict and interdict.
SPECTRUM:
Given that al-Qaeda is riding the technology curve, what
do you expect to see in the next year or two?
HUSICK: I
think you will see a lot more of the same. The
propaganda war is being fought by al-Qaeda and its
affiliates. We haven’t even stepped onto the field. We
are simply not fighting that war. Everyone has said this
is ultimately a battle for the hearts and minds of
Islam, and yet we haven’t even suited up. We probably
aren’t in the locker room. We are just in the parking lot.
I think you’ll see us playing catch-up in a big way,
if we wake up to this stuff. I have been doing my best
to advise the policy guys about it, but strangely they
don’t want to listen too much.
SPECTRUM: Why
not? Is their view that if we win on the battlefield,
the hearts and minds will follow?
HUSICK: There
are a lot of military thinkers who believe that you win
with raw strength, and that is what they respect. There
is a grain of truth to that.
Another competing school of thought is that the United
States has never done a good job at propaganda, and so
we shouldn’t even try. Of course, this is flat wrong. Go
back to the Second World War and look at the propaganda
that Disney put out. It was masterful. It may be,
however, that we have become a too liberal and
sophisticated society to want to dehumanize and
caricature our enemies. There are subtler things that we
could do, but we tend to run away from them.
We need to learn how to use the same tools and
channels that al-Qaeda uses. Right after 9/11, for
instance, we recognized that the Internet was a problem.
The U.S. government set up a counterhacking group, but
then it came to light within a few months that the guys
hired had criminal records, and they were fired
immediately. Well, if you don’t hire a hacker with a
criminal record, you’ve either hired the best hacker in
the world who has never been caught or you’ve got a
second-rate hacker. We need to change our culture really
quickly, and it is very hard to change.
Another thing I see coming is that al-Qaeda will
become more brazen. Their Web sites will become much
more public. They will put public faces on them, in an
attempt to legitimize themselves in the Islamic world.
All the experience they are gaining in media and on use
of the Internet is going to translate directly into a
massively powerful effort in that direction, so powerful
that the state-operated media in the Islamic world and
even organizations like al-Jazeera are going to find
themselves at a huge disadvantage.
These guys are going to have boots on the ground. They
are going to get feeds that are real-time, they are
going to produce it beautifully, and it’s going to be
tremendously persuasive. And the more penetration of the
Internet and of satellite that you get in the Islamic
world, the easier it is going to be to get that message out.
SPECTRUM: Do
you think it is a coincidence that the insurgents are
copying briefing techniques that the U.S. military was
using during Gulf War I?
HUSICK: Well,
media breeds media, so imitation is a sincere form of
flattery. They probably copied them, but for different
purposes. With Gulf War I in particular, we were showing
bomb-drop video and gun-camera video in order to
reassure the American population that this was a
video-game war. There were no Americans in harm’s way.
We can do this from 30 000 feet, so there is no need to worry.
Now the insurgents are using the IED videos to
demonstrate that there is no such thing as a clean war.
That is the direct response.
For more on how on how terrorist and insurgent
groups are leveraging information technology to
organize, recruit, and learn see Open-Source Warfare