Air Repair Cares
During the week last month when two crews were still
aboard they had tried another tack. The two Russians
had replaced the main electrolysis unit with an onboard
spare, a job that took a full day. On 26 September, the
new unit was activated, but it ran for just three hours
before its primary and backup pumps shut down,
apparently responding to an internal overload. The
following day, Tyurin used a circuit-board tester to see
if the microsensors were still connected to the
computer-controlled valves that had been overheated a
week earlier. A spare for that unit was also prepared
for installation.
On 4 October, Tyurin performed additional circuit
tests on the Elektron and confirmed suspicions that
either a non-replaceable internal fuse had blown or a
valve solenoid had burned out. With the device still
dead and now apparently non-repairable, Tyurin replaced
the percussion-based ignition system of the solid-fuel
oxygen generator with an improved, electronically
activated one. He test-fired one of the candles, and it
worked fine. But then the Russians told the crew to hold
off on using any other candles, so as to use up,
instead, the last of the bottled oxygen in the Progress freighter.
The following day, the station crew began dipping into
an oxygen supply that had never been tapped in the five
years since it had been delivered. When the Quest
airlock was attached to the station in July 2001, four
pressurized tanks–two of nitrogen, two of oxygen–were
also bolted into place. The 180 kg of oxygen (about 72
days worth for a crew of three) has been sitting there
until needed in a contingency, which has now arisen.
Given the choice, the very practical Russian
philosophy seemed to be to use the most complicated
device that was still working.
The rationale for this choice was never explained, but
one space program worker privately advised IEEE Spectrum
Online that the solid-fuel generation option was always
considered a “last resort,” a very simple and robust
system that could continue to function in an emergency
when power or temperature anomalies made more complex
systems unworkable. Given the choice, the very practical
Russian philosophy seemed to be to use the most
complicated device that was still working and save the
simple systems for real emergencies.
The Quest tanks can be refilled from reserves brought
up aboard shuttle missions, but this involves activating
some very noisy and power-hungry air pumps inside the
Quest. And this week they were directed to halt use of
the Quest
oxygen tanks and begin using bottled oxygen
from the robot freighter that docked last week.
Orbital Catch-22
Even before Tyurin’s trouble-shooting had quashed all
hope that the Elektron could be repaired, NASA officials
had begun considering the impact of the loss. In a
senior staff meeting on 2 October, Space Station Manager
Mike Suffredini described a space picture that was far
from pretty.
According to minutes of that meeting obtained by the
nasaspaceflight.com Web site, Suffredini described how
the reduced oxygen capabilities on board the station
were a threat to the planned 7 December shuttle launch.
“The biggest challenge will be supporting [safe haven],”
he stated, adding, “the Elektron needs to be recovered.”
In the event that the spare parts about to be
delivered to the station still can’t fix the Russian
unit, Suffredini added that the U.S. Oxygen Generation
System (OGS) delivered on a shuttle flight last summer
might be brought on line sooner than originally planned.
The unit is scaled to provide enough oxygen for a
seven-person crew, and for 10 during visits from other
spacecraft. Unlike the Elektron, with its troublesome
fluids, it uses a solid polymer for electrical
conduction. “OGS hardware is being expedited for flight
[in December],” he announced.
The refrigerator-sized OGS rack, installed in the
Destiny science lab module, still needs some work. A
dump line to get rid of waste hydrogen gas must be
installed, requiring several hours of spacewalk time.
The water supply lines must also be delivered and
installed. But although original plans called for water
to come from a special urine processor not due for
delivery for two more years, a recent redesign now
allows for getting water from a special tank filled by
visiting shuttle missions. If the equipment showed up
and work time were found on three planned U.S.
spacewalks in January, OGS could ease the breathing
crunch soon afterwards.
The Catch-22 is that only a shuttle flight can
reliably restore enough oxygen capacity for the station
to host a stranded shuttle crew, yet without that
capacity, no shuttle can safely fly.
The backup stranded
crew option was put under further strain by
delays in fabricating the redesigned external fuel
tanks, which contributed to the decision to let the
schedule for the next shuttle flight slip from February
to March. However, the “long pole in the tent”—the
element that did the most to slow things down—was the
imperative to keep a stranded crew breathing for another
month in space, while waiting for a rescue mission.
Examining even more far-out alternatives, Suffredini
added, “negotiations are ongoing with the Russians on
crew rescue.” Last summer the Russian Space Agency
announced that it could accelerate its three-seat
Soyuz
launch rate to pick up stranded astronauts, and many
reacted with skepticism. But the plan was feasible, and
Suffridini’s comments show that he takes it seriously.
Meanwhile, the Russians have told NASA that they can
get a completely new Elektron unit aboard their next
scheduled supply drone, set to launch in February 2007,
a job they had earlier said would take until
spring 2007. Reportedly they have also removed other
cargoes and manifested 350 new-design oxygen candles,
which use Sodium Perchlorate rather than Lithium
Perchlorate; these would suffice to keep three people
breathing for three months. But because even these
reserves won’t be delivered until after the shuttle is
supposed to launch, they can’t be relied on for
emergency use. And NASA is considering returning the broken
Elektron on the December shuttle flight, for repair and
re-launch as soon as possible.
The continuing struggle to maintain sufficient
reserves of breathable air has, space experts insist, a
silver lining.
The continuing struggle to maintain sufficient
reserves of breathable air has, space experts insist, a
silver lining, because it allows engineers to spot and
fix problems now, so that the hardware will be truly
reliable on later flights beyond low-earth orbit, which
will be well out of reach of spare-part shipments. The
shakedown may well be the best way to ensure that future
space travelers will breathe easy.
Update, November 1:
On Oct 31, cosmonaut Tyurin switched on the repaired
unit, and a spokesman for the Russian Space Agency
declared that "we can safely say that is now operating
normally." The next morning, however, NASA's website had
a different account: "An initial attempt to turn it on
failed, but a second attempt did activate the unit. It
ran for a short period before failing to its backup
pump, where it now continues to run." Soon afterwards,
NASA commentator John Ira Petty disclosed that the unit
had been "deliberately" turned off again to allow
Mission Control in Moscow to "perform more troubleshooting."
The crew continues to use bottled oxygen from the
newest Progress freighter,
and the saga of the space oxygen supply goes on and on.
To read more on "closed-loop" life support, visit
the following Web sites: