PHOTO: BENJAMIN LOWY/CORBIS
|
"Ahmad Chalabi is not and never was a shareholder
in MTC Atheer" —Ali Al Dahwee
Mistaken Identity
In "Iraq
Goes Wireless
" [March], Ahmad Chalabi is incorrectly
identified as a shareholder in MTC Atheer, the
wireless venture in southern Iraq. Chalabi is not
and never was a shareholder in MTC Atheer. Our
company prides itself on having built a mobile
system operator with Iraqi shareholders and with an
entirely Iraqi workforce. We believe that through
Iraqi hands and the assistance and the backing of
the MTC Group we can further develop the mobile
communications market in Iraq and assist the Iraqi
population economically and socially.
Ali Al Dahwee
Kuwait City, Kuwait
The writer is chief executive officer of MTC Atheer.
Executive editor
Glenn Zorpette responds: In an
interview with me on 1 October in Baghdad, an
official of Iraq's National Communications and Media
Commission described what he said was Chalabi's
involvement in the MTC Atheer venture. However, it
is possible that this official, who could not
subsequently be reached for comment, was referring
to Ali Mudhar Shawqat, who is a major Atheer
shareholder and was once the deputy leader of
Chalabi's political party, the Iraqi National
Congress. IEEE Spectrum regrets the error.
No-Phone Zone
The article on the
use of cellphones in airplanes "[Unsafe
at Any Airspeed?" March] misses the
point. The issue is not that cellphones generate
interference, but, given the vast collection of
inescapable sources of interference to any
aircraft's electronics from the ground—from
assorted other avionics and from passengers who will
always forget to turn their cellphones
off—shouldn't manufacturers and installers of
avionics accept the facts of life and make their
avionics more resistant to interference?
The correct course of action is to engineer,
install, and periodically test the avionics in a
manner that ensures that the avionics can cope with
the real world, not just with a make-believe world.
Michael A. Caloyannides
IEEE Senior Member
Herndon, Va.
While flying
home from a house-hunting trip in 1981 in
a turboprop Short Bros. 360, I began feverishly
working out possible mortgage payments on a cheap
credit card calculator.
Soon the stewardess was walking down the aisle
asking if anyone had anything "electrical" they were
using. I replied that I had a calculator that was
electronic but not electrical—that is, it had no
motors or anything. She borrowed my calculator and
took it to the cockpit. She returned in a few
minutes and admonished me with words like, "Please
don't use that anymore, because when you press the
keys it makes the needles in the cockpit swing
around." Needless to say, I complied.
As pointed out in "Plane Talk About Cellphones"
[Spectral Lines, March], much of the data on signals
interference in aircraft is informal and
hearsay—but this is my anecdote; I witnessed it
myself. I vote for keeping the ban on cellphones.
Chris Jones
Rochester, N.Y.
Is it safe to
use cellphones on airplanes? The real
question should be: "Is it safe for passengers to
use any electronic equipment on airplanes?" My older
notebook computer interferes with VHF Channel 11 on
my TV. My newer notebook computer doesn't, but my
older one didn't cause interference when it was new,
either. And when I'm in my home office with the FM
radio on, I always hear a buzz on the radio just
before my cellphone rings. Granted, aircraft may not
be using the VHF and FM bands, but if these devices
cause interference on these bands, how can we be
sure that they're not causing interference on other bands?
Michael L. Nelson
IEEE Member
Cape Coral, Fla.
Puzzle source: Michael Mepham's Sudoku Web
site, www.sudoku.org.uk
|
Clarification
Several readers expressed skepticism about
whether the Sudoku puzzle published in our February
News section is solvable. Here is the solution. (The
numbers in bold are those originally given.)
Correction
Contrary to what we reported in "Big
Players in Chip Design Buy Into India"
[News, March], Texas Instruments did not codevelop
its single-chip cellphone with Freescale
Semiconductor India and did not use Freescale's MXC
architecture—which Freescale developed
exclusively—in the phone.
Readers are invited to comment on material
published in IEEE Spectrum and on matters of
interest to engineering and technology
professionals. Letters do not represent opinions of
the IEEE. Short, concise letters are preferred. The
Editor reserves the right to edit letters and limit
debate. Contact: Forum, IEEE Spectrum, 3 Park Ave.,
17th floor, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.; fax +1 212
419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.