PHOTO: Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited
|
Sudhinder Thakur, a 58-year-old mechanical engineer
with a degree from the University of Delhi, is executive
director of corporate planning for the Nuclear Power
Corp. of India Ltd. (NPCIL), a government enterprise
charged with building and running the country’s nuclear
power plants. He sat down with IEEE Spectrum
Senior Editor Harry Goldstein in the company’s offices
in Mumbai in January to talk about the recent agreement
between the United States and India that could
ultimately provide India with access to light-water
reactor technology and uranium. Thakur also spoke about
India’s indigenous program, which will ultimately rely
on a combination of fast breeder reactors and thorium,
an element that in India is more plentiful than uranium.
Spectrum
Online: What is the status of the fast
breeder program?
Sudhinder
Thakur: In October 2004, we poured the first
concrete for a 500-megawatt fast breeder reactor, the
first of its kind for commercial purposes in India, and
it is expected to be completed in 2011. It is being set
up near Chennai at Kalpakkam by Bhavini, a satellite
company that the Indian government has set up to build
fast breeder reactors. At the moment, nuclear power
plants can be set up only by government companies.
SPECTRUM: Is
that going to change with the agreement with the United
States?
ST: Yes,
hopefully. That is what we are waiting too see. The
government is considering opening up the nuclear sector
to private partners. There needs to be an amendment to
the act of 1962, which states that only the government
can build, own, and operate nuclear facilities on its
own or through government companies.
SPECTRUM:
Eight years—is that usually how long it takes to build a
nuclear plant?
ST: This is
the first of its kind. NPCIL has set up other kinds of
reactors in about five years, from the first pouring of
concrete to criticality, and then another six months
before commercial operations begin.
SPECTRUM:
What is India’s total nuclear-generating capacity?
ST: We have
today 3900-MW capacity and 2880 MW of capacity under
construction, in addition to the 500-MW fast breeder
reactor.
SPECTRUM: How
does the U.S. agreement to supply uranium and
light-water reactors help India move to thorium and fast
breeders?
ST: We have a
very limited amount of uranium but plenty of thorium, so
we have developed a three-stage program to exploit it.
In the first stage, we load pressurized heavy-water
reactors with natural uranium, which consists of 99.3
percent uranium 238 and 0.7 percent uranium 235. That
0.7 percent produces most of the power. Some of the
uranium 238 does, however, get converted to plutonium,
and when the spent fuel comes out, we can separate the
plutonium out.
In the second stage, we load the right mix of
plutonium and uranium 238 into fast breeder reactors,
which produce energy and more plutonium. Later on, we
put a blanket of thorium around the reactor, and some of
it converts to uranium 233, which we extract. In the
third stage, we use the uranium 233 as fuel.
We have enough thorium in the country to meet
requirements for thousands of years, much more than our
supplies of coal or other sources of fuel. So, this
three-stage program has great potential, but the
technologies needed for the final stage will take
decades to fully develop.
SPECTRUM:
What about India’s more immediate needs?
ST: We are
consuming about 600 kilowatthours per capita annually,
compared with 13 000 kWh per capita in the U.S., and we
are importing most of our energy, in the form of oil,
gas, and some coal. If we can import uranium, then we
can set up these nuclear power stations based on
international cooperation, in addition to our indigenous
program.
We think that 20 000 to 40 000 MW of capacity can be
added with this cooperative program with the U.S. in the
next 30 years. It depends upon how fast—you know,
sometimes these international developments go very fast
and then sometimes they are very slow.
SPECTRUM:
Japan and France both had fast breeder reactor programs,
but neither one is operational now. Why will India’s
fast breeder succeed where others have failed?
ST: The
requirements of each country are different. For us,
what’s important is energy self-sufficiency. Japan is
interested because fast breeders use the waste left over
from the first stage. And now people are realizing that
at the rate we are using uranium, the world’s supply
will be exhausted by the year 2050. So fuels are going
to have to be reused.
SPECTRUM:
Within the next two to three years, you’ll have an
additional 2880 MW of capacity coming online from
nuclear reactors?
ST: Yes.
SPECTRUM:
But, conceivably, all of this could accelerate quickly
if parts of the industry are privatized?
ST: It is not
a question of privatization but of international access
to reactors and fuel. When privatization comes, the next
question is how much we can set up in the existing
framework. In the next five-year plan, from 2007 to
March 2012, we will propose to the government that we
add 10 000 MW of nuclear capacity through this imported
route. This is in addition to the 2880 MW of capacity
that our indigenous program will add.
SPECTRUM:
What were the circumstances that lead to the new
agreement?
ST: We agreed
to separate our civilian from our military programs,
which will be subjected to the same inspections that
other countries are subjected to. Whatever we have
agreed to for our civilian nuclear facilities, we have
also agreed to for power production.
SPECTRUM:
What’s the next step?
ST: We will
separate our activities, and we will be subjected to
IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] inspections.
It is not right to say that first we will separate our
activities and then we will sign an agreement. All these
things are happening simultaneously. We will negotiate
what is known as the 1-2-3 agreement with the United
States—which will mark the conditions for the
availability of the technology from the U.S. and nuclear
supplies, too—and we will negotiate further
international agreements with the Nuclear Suppliers
Group [a group of nuclear supplier countries that seeks
to contribute to the nonproliferation of nuclear
weapons] and the IAEA.
SPECTRUM: How
much does electricity generated by your nuclear plants
cost now, and will this agreement ultimately make it
cheaper?
ST: Using
indigenous supplies of uranium, we are competitive at
distances of 800 to 1000 kilometers from the closest
coal mine, because of the cost of transporting the coal.
Now, suppose we had access to international fuel; then
the same reactors would be competitive even much closer,
and possibly they would be “location neutral,” which
means that wherever you are, you should be able to
compete. With the availability of uranium at
international prices, the nuclear power reactors set up
with foreign cooperation will be competitive with
thermal power plants located much closer to the coal
mines. The tariff of our oldest power station at Tarapur
(the Tarapur Atomic Power Station or TAPS-1&2) is
about 2 cents per kilowatthour and the average tariff of
nuclear power in the country is about 5 cents per
kilowatthour.
For more about India’s nuclear power program, visit
NPCIL’s Web site at http://www.npcil.nic.in.