Supposedly stupendous
memory technologies have come and gone
before without ever ruffling the commercial market.
Holographic memory as a mass-market technology has been
"just around the corner" for at least 25 years. More
recently, schemes based on molecules or even bacterial
proteins have excited researchers before turning out to
have essentially insurmountable manufacturing,
longevity, or other problems.
What makes probe memory different is that it is based
on proven technologies. Probe memory is an offshoot of
the scanning probe microscope, a form of which was
invented in 1981 by Binnig (hence his Nobel prize) and
Heinrich Rohrer, a Swiss physicist who retired in 1997
after 34 years at ZRL. These nonoptical microscopes,
which include the scanning tunneling and atomic force
microscopes, scan the surface being examined with the
tip of a long, thin wisp of metal or silicon called a
cantilever. The cantilever's probe tip is just atoms
wide, so it maps surfaces with atomic-scale resolution.
PHOTOS: PAT MAZZERA; CHRISTIAN DIETRICH
|
The pioneers of
probe: Nanochip founder and CTO Tom Rust
[left] and CEO Gordon Knight are vying for the
nanotech-storage prize. Nobel laureate Gerd Binnig [far
right], inventor of the scanning probe and atomic force
microscopes, is the driving force behind IBM's Millipede
project.
Basically, a probe memory uses arrays of dozens or
hundreds of these same tips to write, read, and erase
nanoscale bits in neat columns on a piece of storage
medium made of specially engineered plastic or an exotic
alloy. Depending on the probe-drive design, either the
storage medium or the probe-tip array is mounted on a
moving platform, which scans the stationary component to
align the tips with either bits to be read or locations
where bits are to be written. To write, read, or erase
data, the tips are heated and then pressed onto the
medium. Because the tips are so fine, the bits occupy
spaces on the medium just 10 nanometers wide, or roughly
the width of 100 hydrogen atoms.
Like a hard disk drive or an optical disc drive, a
probe-drive system accesses data at random locations by
reading current through the tips as they pass over the
bits to determine whether they are 1s or 0s. Control
circuitry aligns the mechanical components with
nanometer precision, and error-correction codes ensure
the integrity of the data being written and read. The
basic concept has been proved over and over by both IBM
and Nanochip. The game now is making the memory devices
cheaply by the millions and fabricating probe tips that,
despite their extreme delicacy, can withstand the wear
of tens of thousands of read/write cycles.
The story of probe storage begins with Binnig's
co-invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM)
24 years ago. It let researchers see, for the first
time, surface features down to the atomic scale. With a
voltage applied to it, an STM's ultrasharp tip, which is
very close to but not touching a sample of conductive
material, attracts electrons from the material's surface
atoms, resulting in a weak current. Since the amount of
current depends on the distance between the tip and the
surface, measuring the current as the tip scans the
sample provides the data necessary to plot a
three-dimensional picture of the sample's surface.
It was Nobel-quality work, but Binnig was already
looking for something better: he wanted to image
insulators as well as conductors. He was drowsing on his
couch while on sabbatical in 1985 when he literally
dreamed up the idea of the atomic force microscope, or
AFM, which would eventually become the basis for
probe-storage technology. In the process of creating
these two nonoptical instruments to image materials on
the atomic scale, he had stumbled on a means to
manipulate, as well as characterize, matter at the
nanoscale. In effect, he had opened a window on what the
physicist Richard P. Feynman famously termed the
"bottom," in his 1959 talk at the annual meeting of the
American Physical Society about "the problem of
manipulating and controlling things on a small scale."
Throughout the 1980s, atomic manipulation with STM
probes fascinated researchers. Several labs, including
ones at AT&T, Stanford University, Hitachi, and the
U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology,
used STM probes to build crude features on surfaces atom
by atom. But it wasn't until 1990, when Nature published
the now famous picture of the letters I-B-M spelled out
in 35 xenon atoms, that it really hit home with people
outside the insular STM research community: you could
use probes to move individual atoms around in a highly
controlled manner [see photo, "Small Blue"].
Among the people most
impressed by "IBM" writ small was Nanochip
founder and chief technology officer Tom Rust. If you
could use probe tips to create orderly patterns on
surfaces, he reasoned, it followed that you could use
those same STM probes to write and read data. "I saw
what IBM had done with a scanning tunneling microscope
and spelling out 'I-B-M,'" he says, "and that inspired
me to use probes to build a disk drive."
It was 1991, and Rust, an engineer who had spent most
of his career working on hardware and software for
displays, had just devoured K. Eric Drexler's nanotech
manifesto Engines of Creation (Anchor Press/Doubleday,
1986). He was looking for a way to engineer Drexler's
ideas into products when IBM, his future rival, provided
the answer. Though he had no experience with
nanotechnology, he plunged into it with the fervor of a
true believer.
Rust's divergent career had begun in 1975, when, as
an undergraduate computer science major at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, he took on a
consulting gig for Magnavox Co. to build one of the
first graphic cathode-ray-tube displays. He soon dropped
out of college to create arcade video games and
eventually went on to run a series of small businesses
that produced 3-D solid modeling and animation hardware
and software. This phase of his career culminated in a
commission from the government of Singapore in 1990 to
build a $2 million laser-dappled musical water fountain
that now gushes on Sentosa Island, off Singapore's
coast.
Then, infected by Drexler's visions of nanomechanical
assemblers that could fabricate any kind of material or
machine from the atoms up, he "caught the nanotechnology
bug" and holed up for several weeks in the library
stacks at the University of California, Berkeley, and
Stanford University doing what he had done his whole
life—teaching himself something new. He quickly
concluded that he would have to use some sort of
MEMS-based device as a platform for his STM probe, so he
delved into technical journals to learn MEMS design and
manufacturing.
After hearing that Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, in California, had an STM, Rust contacted
the lab and learned of a U.S. Department of Energy
program that provided $5000 grants to small businesses
so they could access lab facilities and services. Rust
applied, and soon he found himself at Livermore
developing a write-once medium on which an STM could
make 30-nm diameter "donuts," his first nanobits. For
that he and Joanne Culver, his research partner and
wife, were awarded U.S. Patent No. 5453970, but further
investigation and extensive reading quickly led him to
shift from his original STM concept to another
technology invented by Binnig at IBM, the atomic force
microscope.
Both map the topography of the surface of a material
using a sharp-tipped cantilever, but in contrast to the
STM, the AFM maps the surface of a material with laser
light. As the probe scans the sample surface, the
electron clouds orbiting the atoms at the tip bump the
ones orbiting the atoms on the sample's surface, ever so
slightly deflecting the cantilever. A photodetector
records the laser light reflected off the cantilever,
providing the data necessary to determine the amount of
deflection, and to create a 3-D image of the surface
topology.
While intrigued with the idea of using an AFM tip in
direct contact with a surface to read and write bits,
Rust knew that the speed of the tip skimming over a
spinning disk would quickly grind the tip down. So he
designed a MEMS device that would hold the tip and help
it nimbly skip over the rotating platter, touching down
only where it needed to write a bit, until it ran out of
travel. Then the MEMS platform would hop backward over
the medium, not unlike the automated stylus arm on a
turntable, which at the end of a record picks up and
moves back to the starting position.
"One day I was looking at the complexity of this and
thought, well, this is crazy!" says Rust with a chuckle.
Instead of skip-hopping heads over a spinning disk, he
figured he could have the MEMS platform move up and down
and side to side over a stationary storage material,
radically cutting down on component complexity and power
consumption. The Nanochip was born.
Rust built the first MEMS devices in 1994 with a
0.8-micrometer process traditionally used for making
chips. He designed and built four platforms per die,
with eight cantilevers on each, along with some
electronic controls. It was, he admits, a dismal failure
that taught him a lot about MEMS and chip design and
fabrication, including the fact that the Nanochip (or
IBM's Millipede for that matter) doesn't need to be made
by the world's most advanced 90-nm chip fabrication
process. An old 1-mm fab is perfectly capable of making
MEMS scanners and AFM tip arrays, a major reason that
researchers are confident they'll be able to fabricate
probe drives cheaply.
For the next two years, Rust shuttled across San
Francisco Bay between his house in Oakland and the
Stanford campus, where he paid to use MEMS fabrication
equipment to prototype his designs and tweak the
fabrication process. By 1996, he had made enough
progress to impress his deep-pocketed friend Jerry
Fiddler, founder of Wind River Systems Inc., a software
company in Alameda, Calif. With Fiddler's backing, Rust
phased out his computer graphics business and
incorporated his new endeavor as Nanochip.