Photo: Harry Goldstein
|
Gerry F. Grove-White,
executive director and chief operating officer of
Tata Power Co., in Mumbai, discusses Mumbai’s power
crisis with Senior Editor Harry Goldstein. The
interview was conducted in January 2007, before the
blackout of 25 February 2007 and subsequent
electricity rate increases and conservation
campaigns went into effect.
For an audio sample of
this interview, please click here.
Grove-White: I guess you’ll get a sense that it’s
slightly precarious now, that the past can’t necessarily
predict the future.
Spectrum: I’ve had a little of that, but maybe you can
explain more.
Grove-White: I think, my view is that the load is
rising a lot faster and a lot quicker than anybody
realizes. I look out my flat and every tower crane I
see, I see increased load. And where you see an old
building in south Bombay come down, and up goes a
20-story block of flats, that’s it. And the investment
in generation has not kept pace. Whereas up until almost
last year—last year we scraped by. This year the jury is
out when summer comes. That puts a very, very high
priority on getting more generation completed. And we
actually have on our own count 250 megawatts of
coal-fired plant; steel erection started on the first of
January out at Trombay, which will go some way to
filling that gap. And we are pushing as hard as we can
to gain all the necessary consents and acquire the land
to build what initially will be a 1600-MW plant on the
other side of the harbor, with all probability a third
unit going in to take it up to 2400 MW, but that is at
least…(I was plotting out the coal that we require
yesterday), and it’s somewhere in the middle of 2010 if
all goes well, in terms of consent and acquiring the
land and everything else, and that will be the first
unit commissioned in 2010. If that happens, then we’re
okay. But between now and 2010 it looks fairly
difficult. That’s all against a developing regulatory
environment, trading environment, transmission
infrastructure, improving in parts. So it’s not easy to
be certain that we will get through that summer without
a few days of load shedding. Which would be a great
shame, but you know, this is the reality and you’ve got
to take these decisions [to add more generation] five or
10 years earlier.
And I think what’s happened is that the economic
acceleration has taken people by surprise. My return to
Bombay up until last October was just once a year, and
it was a snapshot. Now I’m firmly convinced that it took
some by surprise that the Indian economy ramped itself
up from 2 to 3 percent growth rates in the 1980s, to 5,
6, 7 percent in the ’90s, and then suddenly these last
two years it’s up to 8, 9, 10 percent. And in certain
states, a hell of a lot more than that; the western
states in particular, in Gujarat and Maharashtra, their
economic growth has been well in excess of 10 percent,
I’m sure. And that’s put the stress on the system. If
you look back, if you ask the question, how did Bombay
cope? Why has it been successful in ways that other
cities in India have not? Milton Friedman would clearly
say that it was because it was a privatized license, and
lo and behold, the lights stayed on in Bombay. That
would be the defining feature that differentiates the
license and the presence of private, profit-making
entities.
Spectrum: So is there a lesson?
Grove-White: There certainly was. Whether private
entities can solve India’s problems, I’m not so sure.
Privatized companies are part of the solution, but we
come from a very small base. Tata Power is the largest
private power company, and it has 2300 MW—that’s a very
low place. NTPC [National Thermal Power Corporation] is
out there in the top four or five worldwide, and they’ve
got 35 000 MW. That’s not to say that we don’t have
aspirations. We just won a bid to build a 4000-MW
station. We’re delighted with that, and if we can win
another one, we’ll do that as well. And that will start
to give us some critical mass.
Spectrum: Is there a move to take advantage of the new
trading infrastructure?
Grove-White: We were one of the earliest participants
in trading power in India. We have a wholly owned
subsidiary called Tata Power Trading. And it’s an active
trader, but it’s against a background that the amount of
surplus power available to be traded is small in
absolute terms. And if we look at, I mentioned earlier,
the development of the station to the south on the other
side of the harbor, it’s likely that a good portion of
that will be traded. Probably half of it will come into
the licensed area and therefore under MERC [Maharashtra
Electricity Regulatory Commission]. And half will either
be sold on contract, and we’ll keep some available to
trade. And I think a lot of private investment in power
stations will sell their output in that manner, some on
contract, some to their own distribution businesses if
they’ve got them, and the rest will be put in trading
entities. I think the trading platform that is being
discussed—I’m not against the establishment of a trading
platform—but I think what they’re talking about at the
moment is essentially a day ahead market. It’s just too
short. Why would anyone trade a day ahead? It’s just not
that sophisticated. What we want is to sell strips—six
months, nine months.
But back to [what makes Bombay different from the
rest of India]. The licensed plants have served the city
of Bombay well. And it’s not just the generation side.
It’s the transmission and the distribution. And people
can apply for connections and get them pretty damn
quick. That’s the other side of the coin that doesn’t
always get recognized is that the whole infrastructure
is present in the city, not just the generation side.