Forum: Our Readers Write
First Published June 2007
“Powering and networking small systems in areas
without electricity isn’t a brand-new problem”
—Ian Findlay
LAPTOPS FOR ALL
Powering and
networking small systems in areas without
electricity isn’t a brand-new problem [“The
Laptop Crusade,” April]. When there
were no telephone lines in outback Australia, people
used HF radio. There was, of course, no electric
power until quite recently.
In 1929, a guy named Alfred Traegar devised the
“pedal radio,” which generated power by means of
disused bicycle parts and later the planetary gears
from a Model T’s steering. Traegar is hailed to this
day as the man who brought communications to the
vast and rural outback. The pedal radio system was
also promoted by John Flynn, moderator of the
Presbyterian Church, because it complemented his
Flying Doctor aerial medical initiative. You can
find more details about Traegar’s pedal radios in
Ion L. Idriess’s biography of Flynn, Flynn of the Inland.
Schools in disadvantaged areas anywhere can rig
something similar. Youngsters could take turns
pedaling in relays and could charge one or perhaps a
whole bank of laptops.
Ian Findlay
IEEE Member
Sydney
POWER IN THE HOME
I really
enjoyed “A
Power Plant for the Home” [News,
April]. In it, reporter Prachi Patel Predd writes
that “micro-CHP growth might be slower in North
America than in Europe and Japan because many of the
same homes that require a lot of heating in winter
also run electricity-hungry air conditioners in the
summer.” But this is a problem that could probably
be solved through the use of absorption-type
heat-pump air conditioners. For example, Honda
recently introduced what it calls the world’s first
ultrasmall absorption-type heat-pump air
conditioner for home use. It uses neither
electricity nor Freon. Honda says the unit uses air
as the cooling medium and is suited to cold climates
as well, because it can also work as a heat-pump heater.
I have seen natural gas–powered absorption air
conditioners. They are quite efficient. With a bit
more development, perhaps they could even be
designed to use heat from the engine to reduce the
natural gas burned directly in the air conditioner.
Jose Sousa
IEEE Member
Broomfield, Colo.
Some recent
comments in IEEE Spectrum on solar and
other alternative-energy systems have overlooked
payback considerations. In 1973, I was part of a
small team working at CBS Laboratories on
gallium-arsenide solar arrays. We were led by Denis
Gabor, who had received the Nobel Prize for physics
in 1971 for his work that led to holography. Gabor
was a boyhood friend of Peter Goldmark, who headed
the labs, and Goldmark asked Gabor to suggest
possible alternative-energy approaches.
Early on, Gabor asked: “How long did the system
have to operate to recover the energy required to
fabricate the system and supporting infrastructure?”
Although the answer—18 years with the system
operating somewhere near the equator—became the kiss
of death for this particular program, Gabor had
opened the door to evaluating the payback times of
these projects using financial models. By the way,
Gabor also envisaged direct conversion of the solar
array’s output into hydrogen, which would be stored
at very high pressures in flexible bladders on the seabed.
Terence Roach
IEEE Life Member
Fairfield, Conn.
HOT CARS
For the
Honda FCX/Concept car, claimed fuel
efficiency is “435 km from 171 liters of hydrogen,
stored at 350 atmospheres” [“Top
10 Tech Cars,” April].
I would believe a claimed fuel efficiency of 435
km from hydrogen stored at 350 atm and occupying
only 171 liters of space in high pressure
(composite?) tanks. This would be 59 850 liters of
hydrogen, since gas volume is measured at standard
temperature and pressure (25 °C and 1 atm). Thus,
they are going to use 2672 moles of hydrogen, (a
little less than 5.4 kg) to go 435 km, or about 1.25
kg/100 km.
Pretty impressive. But not 2.54 kilometers per
liter of hydrogen!
Doc Dougherty
IEEE Member
Playa del Rey, Calif.
The author
replies: Nice catch! Thanks for reading
so closely.
CORRECTIONS
In “Top 10 Tech Cars” [April], the description of
the Tesla Roadster should have noted that it is
adapted from a Lotus-designed and engineered “donor”
platform, which Lotus uses in its Elise roadster.
Tesla’s engineers worked closely with Lotus’s
engineers to adapt the platform, and they did
substantial reworking to accept a totally different
power plant and a completely different body in
carbon fiber rather than fiberglass. They also
extended the wheelbase. The Tesla is built at the
same Lotus plant that builds the Elise.
In “The Laptop Crusade” [April], the number of
schoolchildren in Nigeria was incorrectly stated;
Nigeria has 45 million school-age children; at any
one time 4 million are at the same grade
level.Ed.
Readers are invited to comment on material
published in IEEE Spectrum and on matters of
interest to engineering and technology
professionals. Letters do not represent the
opinions of the IEEE. Letters may be edited for
space and clarity. For more letters, see “…And
More Forum” at
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org.
Contact: Forum, IEEE Spectrum, 3 Park Ave., 17th
floor, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.; fax, + 1 212
419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.
|