Images: Picometrix (2)
|
T-RAY VISION: Terahertz radiation passes through leather and
other common materials but reflects off metal to
reveal a gun in a purse.
|
T-rays are
odd: they’re not quite what we think of as
radio and not quite what we expect from light. They can
radiate from metal antennas as radio waves do, but they
also bounce off ordinary mirrors as light does. They can
be focused with silicon lenses but are typically sensed
in a circuit by their electric field.
They make up one of the least-used chunks of the
electromagnetic rainbow, comprising an absolutely vast
swath of relatively virgin territory. It has long been a
gap in our otherwise extensive mastery of
electromagnetic waves. On the one side are radio waves,
which emanate from and are received by antennas and are
manipulated with electronics. On the other there’s
light, which we’ve become quite adept at bounding,
bending, and steering with mirrors, lenses, and optical fibers.
Where the terahertz band begins and ends depends to a
degree on whom you ask. We put it between 500 gigahertz
and 10 terahertz, for a few reasons. That region is
largely beyond the reach of pure radio frequency
technology such as microwave circuits, requiring
combinations of electronics and optics instead. Also,
many interesting materials such as plastic explosives
have distinctive colors in that region. On the downside,
most terahertz radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere.
And the technology that is needed to see in that band is
much less mature than, say, the technology for the
region near 100 GHz, whose fundamental components have
been around for half a century.
Others choose to define the terahertz band beginning
at a lower frequency, 10 GHz in some cases, where light
has a wavelength measured in millimeters. Like
higher-frequency T-rays, millimeter waves can pass
through clothing, a property applied in scanners built
by companies such as Millivision, Quinetiq, and
Safeview, which the companies have tested in airports
and other locations. The scanners made by the former two
companies rely on the small amount of millimeter-wave
radiation emitted by all warm bodies. They find hidden
weapons beneath people’s clothing by noting the
difference in the amount of radiation between the warm
body and the cooler objects.
Known as passive imagers, these devices can see
through many of the same materials as T-rays, but they
can’t determine an object’s chemical makeup the way
T-rays can. Also, their resolution is naturally not as
good as terahertz imagers, because as the imaging
radiation’s wavelength gets shorter, an imager’s
resolution improves. These scanners are capable of
discovering that someone is hiding something, but that
something—a cellphone, a knife, a bomb—usually looks
like a blob on the millimeter-wave imager.
Only in the last decade have scientists and engineers
found ways, exotic though they are, to break into the
true terahertz band. The most extreme of these—using a
particle accelerator—is also the most powerful. The
accelerators work well for this purpose, but they
typically take up a hectare or more and cost tens of
millions of dollars. Commercial systems, from Picometrix
or TeraView, for example, generate T-rays much more
economically and compactly: they zap semiconductors with
femtosecond-long laser pulses or mix together a pair of
infrared laser beams. And researchers are looking into
other promising T-ray sources, ones that use
semiconductor lasers cooled by liquid helium.
Scientists are also working on new ways to form an
image from T-rays. The ideal terahertz camera would be
just like any digital camera—a dense array of millions
of detectors arranged as pixels on an integrated
circuit. Unfortunately, most terahertz detectors lack
the combination of compactness, cheapness, and
sensitivity to allow for that. Instead, terahertz
researchers have come up with a number of alternatives
that use one or only a few detectors. Two of the leading
approaches are to reconstruct a terahertz image from the
way T-rays interfere with one another or to convert the
otherwise invisible rays into something a digital camera
can see.
But before you can make a picture, you need to be able
to produce the radiation. In the last 10 years or so,
researchers have come up with a number of ways of
generating terahertz waves, each with their own distinct
disadvantages—cost, complexity, the need for cryogenic
cooling, size, or some combination of all four.
Synchrotrons, which accelerate bunches of electrons
along an enormous track to nearly the speed of light,
are the brightest sources, but they typically occupy an
entire building, and a rather large one at that. To
produce T-rays, the synchrotron forces the fast-moving
electrons to make either a sharp bend or to wriggle
through a gauntlet of magnets, both resulting in a
shower of T‑rays, though of different bandwidths. The
latter, a specialized portion of a synchrotron known as
a free-electron laser, is in use at a new facility in
Novosibirsk, Russia. Last August scientists there
reported the production of a terahertz laser beam of up
to a record 400 watts.
The other synchrotron version, the sharp bend, is in
use by Gwyn P. William and colleagues at the Jefferson
Lab, in Newport News, Va. Forcing a fast-moving electron
to make a sharp turn produces a broad spectrum of T-rays
instead of the single frequency of a laser beam. At many
tens of watts, the Jefferson machine is still orders of
magnitude more powerful than most other sources. In
fact, it may be powerful enough to penetrate some
distance into the ground and discover land mines and
IEDs at a distance; because of this the U.S. military
has contracted Advanced Energy Systems to design an
electron accelerator and T-ray generator compact enough
to fit in a Humvee and capable of producing 1 W of
radiation. The portable version would have a design more
akin to a free-electron laser, but it would produce a
broader spectrum of T-rays than a laser can.
There are many types of T-ray sources that have
smaller footprints than the enormous electron racetracks
in Newport News and Novosibirsk. These depend on
combining electronics with lasers, befitting the
radiation’s straddling of the two worlds.
Gigahertz-frequency oscillation is no big deal—the
inexpensive circuits in your cellphone are a testament
to that fact. But it’s quite another thing to build a
circuit that oscillates trillions of times per second at
terahertz rates. Even the 2006 record holder for the
fastest-switching transistor in the world, the 845‑GHz
device made by Milton Feng’s group at the University of
Illinois at Urbana‑Champaign, is barely in the terahertz
range. However, for over a decade, scientists have been
able to generate laser pulses so short that 10 trillion
or more could fit in a single second. So the most common
commercial method of making T-rays is to drive an
electronic circuit with a picosecond pulse of laser
light. Such a T-ray generator is basically a
photosensitive semiconductor with a pair of antennas
etched onto its surface. A voltage on the antennas sets
up a strong electric field across the semiconductor
between them. When the laser pulse strikes the
semiconductor it creates pairs of charge carriers:
electrons and holes. These accelerate across the
semiconductor and through the antennas. For a
femtosecond-long pulse, the rush of current lasts about
a picosecond, about the period of one cycle of 1-THz
radiation.
The resulting T-ray pulse is weak, with an average
power only somewhere around a microwatt, but it’s still
bright enough to produce still images. And the pulses
have a couple of interesting side benefits. First, as
with radar, timing the pulse’s echo as it bounces off an
object gives the range to that object. Range is useful
in processing multilevel T-ray images, such as a scan of
a suitcase that might be difficult to interpret unless
it had been scrutinized layer by layer. Second, pulses
let you perform spectroscopy, the identification of a
substance by the wavelengths of light it reflects. This
capability comes from the fact that a single pulse
actually comprises a broad swath of T-ray frequencies.
You need only analyze the shape of the pulse’s echo to
calculate which frequencies were absorbed and then look
up what substances produce that absorption pattern.
The problem with pulses is that they are quickly
absorbed and “smeared” in air, particularly humid air.
After only a few meters in moist air, a 1-ps pulse lasts
30 ps, and the resolution of an image it forms degrades,
as does its spectroscopic signal. Fortunately, the
terahertz spectrum has a few transmission windows at
frequencies that aren’t strongly absorbed in air. So one
solution is to generate a continuous wave at one or more
of those frequencies.
Researchers are already making such continuous-wave
sources, basically with the same setup of a laser
shining on the surface of an antenna-equipped
semiconductor, but with the femtosecond laser replaced
with a continuous one whose amplitude is oscillating at
a terahertz frequency [see illustration “T-Ray Scanner”].