Photo: Chris Mueller
|
Chip Guru: Dan Edelstein is leading the second revolution
in chip interconnects.
|
The industry has been insulating microchip conductors
with silicon dioxide (glass, basically) since the first
commercial integrated circuits were introduced in 1961.
For years, the wires that carry the electrical current
on a chip were barely an afterthought. “The transistor
was everything,” says Edelstein.
But by 2000, joining the millions of transistors into
a functioning integrated circuit necessitated nearly 2
km of wire. Nobody wants wider chips (space on a circuit
board is always tight), so the only way to pack in all
that wiring is to make them taller. To do that,
individual wiring levels—each consisting of the
glasslike insulating material inlaid with a network of
the copper wiring—are stacked on top of each other by a
process called dual damascene, named for the ancient
Middle Eastern method of inlaying gold or silver into a
sword.
To build the stack, the base level—the
dinner-plate-size wafer containing the transistors—is
first covered with a layer of insulation made of an
impure glass variant. A pattern is transferred onto it
by photolithography, which is similar to photography:
the insulation is covered with a light-sensitive
material called a photoresist, onto which a pattern is
projected, using ultraviolet light streaming through a
mask. When the light hits the exposed areas of the
photoresist, it changes the material’s chemical
properties: the area in the mask’s shadow remains strong
and corrosion resistant, but the area exposed to light
has become vulnerable. A corrosive plasma eats away the
vulnerable areas and the insulation beneath, creating a
network of trenches.
Now this level is ready for its wiring. First, the
glass is lined with a thin, corrosion-resistant film.
Then the trenches are filled with copper. The wafer is
scoured and polished to a flat surface, until the only
metal that remains is inside the trenches. The result is
a glassy surface inlaid with many meters of glittering
copper canals.
The last step is the application of a capping layer of
organosilicate—silicon dioxide that has been impregnated
with carbon. This layer separates the levels from each
other and provides added structural support. Then the
process starts anew. Today’s state-of-the-art chips can
have up to 10 of these levels. But they are not strictly
identical. Instead, they gradually increase in
thickness, so that the lowest level of wiring is smaller
and more delicate than the topmost level by a factor of
eight. At the higher levels of the chip, the insulation
is thicker and the wiring more substantial.
But this process no longer suffices. There’s too much
drag on the signal traveling down the tiny wires. The
culprits are capacitance and resistance. Long, thin
wires have more resistance, of course, than short, thick
ones. So you can’t do much worse than a nanoscopically
thin collection of wire segments that would span a small
town if laid end to end. Think of trying to suck a drink
through a 2-meter-long cocktail straw. This is why the
industry abandoned aluminum for copper wiring—its
greater conductivity overcame the resistance of thin wiring.
The other—and bigger—problem is capacitance. When
wires are cramped so closely together, the electric
field from one wire is felt by neighboring wires, and
that creates an unintended capacitor. A capacitor stores
electrons, somewhat like a battery. Storing electrons is
great for batteries, but it’s bad when those electrons
need to get somewhere else. Picture the electrons
traveling down the wires in waves. The capacitance in
the wire acts like a breaker, damping the waves’ motion
and therefore slowing the rate at which the signal can
travel from one end of the wire to the other.
A transistor on a digital chip is just a switch that
operates at incredibly high speed—2.7 billion times a
second in the current generation of microchips. The
higher the capacitance between the wires, the more power
the transistor needs to operate at that speed. The
result is power drain. Reducing capacitance lets the
chip use less power to switch at the same speed.
Making the wires thicker isn’t an option, so the only
solution is to improve the insulator’s dielectric
constant, a measure of the insulation’s ability to
concentrate an electric field. The dielectric constant
is usually referred to simply as k. The lower the
k-value, the better
the insulation.
The lowest possible k-value is 1.0, and
the only way to achieve that number is with the ideal
insulator: vacuum. Natural glass has a k-value of 4.2. When
that started to become a problem, researchers began
pushing that number lower by “doping” their silicon
dioxide—mixing the glass with other elements, like
fluorine and carbon. For decades, chip manufacturers
have been groaning under the strain of pushing the
dielectric constant from 4 to the mid-3s (fluorinated
silicon dioxide) to the high 2s (silicon dioxide with
severe carbon doping). The problem is that loading the
insulator with carbon also changes its density, making
the material softer and weaker. Insulation will tolerate
only so much doping.
By figuring out how to use vacuum, IBM shot the
industry-leading dielectric constant from a spongy 2.7
to an eyebrow-raising 1.9. The resulting microprocessor
leapfrogs a full generation in total chip performance
without a chip redesign.
So how do you make bubbles full of nothing? There are
two ways to make air gaps, and how IBM makes them
depends on where in the chip the gaps need to go. For
higher levels, the spacing between the wires is less
critical, so the vacuum pockets can be carved
conventionally—with masks, ultraviolet light, and
plasma. As usual, after the interconnect pattern is
projected onto the insulation, plasma digs out the
channels, and the wiring is laid. That process is then
repeated to carve holes into the insulation around the
wiring. The level is capped off with organosilicate in a
vacuum chamber and, voilà, air gaps. The organosilicate
cap layer remains, holding the wiring in place at the
top and bottom, but the carved-out spaces between the
wires are empty.
This strategy doesn’t work at the lower levels,
because the tiny spaces between the wiring don’t
tolerate the slightest error. At the lowest levels of
the next-generation chips, the width of the insulation
between wires is about 50 nanometers. Not even the best
production processes can create holes inside features
that small without nicking the wiring. Thus exposed, the
copper would melt under the extreme heat of the plasma
and leak through the air gap, fuse with neighboring
wires, and ruin the chip. Conventional techniques simply
can’t ensure enough precision. Edelstein and Nitta had
to invent a different way to make the really, really
tiny holes.