Illustration: jason lee
|
When is a flying car not a flying car? When it’s a
Transition and when its maker, Terrafugia, insists on
calling it a “roadable aircraft.”
Think of it as an airplane prototype suited for
limited operation on land, the Cambridge, Mass., company
says. In other words, do your best to imagine an
eccentric flying machine that only occasionally
moonlights as a car.
Like platform shoes and plastic flamingos, the
convertible car–airplane concept just won’t go away.
During the past century, dozens of models have emerged,
including one capable of vertical takeoff and one with
bolted-on wings that pilots detached and carted along in
a trailer. None have risen above the status of
historical footnote.
Here’s the problem: it has proven to be virtually
impossible to craft a light, agile plane that also
handles well on the road. Basically, a car is safer and
more stable when it’s heavier, while a plane flies
better when it’s lightweight.
So far, Terrafugia has completed a detailed design and
is now trying to raise funds to build a prototype by
2008. To hide the fact that the Transition is a flimsy
car and a feeble plane, Terrafugia designed the vehicle
to weigh just under 600 kilograms, the cutoff for the
U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s new light-sport
aircraft class. Such planes are to be flown only in good
weather at low altitudes and relatively slow speeds, and
Terrafugia hopes that in this class, the Transition’s
limitations won’t stand out.
In Terrafugia’s simulations, the Transition looks like
a stubby little plane affixed to a four-wheel platform.
At the push of a button, the wings fold and tuck in
alongside the body, sort of like the wings of a perched
eagle. With bumpers on both ends, the car-shaped body
would cause the Transition to experience more drag and
fly at slightly lower speeds than other light-sport
aircraft. Unlike those on normal planes, its wings would
be flat on the bottom so that they could fold
completely—which reduces the Transition’s aerodynamic
performance.
What the Experts Say
GORDON BELL: If he builds one, it may be good
training. No harm done. Every decade, someone should
try to build one.
As a car, however, the Transition fares far worse.
Although 600 kg isn’t unreasonable for a light prop
plane, it is decidedly wispy for a car. For comparison,
a Mini Cooper, one of the smallest four-seat cars that
is widely available in North America, weighs almost
twice that much. A strong gust of wind could cause the
Transition to fishtail. To make things worse, its folded
wings would create mammoth blind spots on a vehicle the
length of a large pickup truck and would be easy targets
for fender benders.
Terrafugia says that in car mode, the Transition would
typically be used only to drive between home and
airport. Still, that might be enough to exasperate its
owners. “We have become very demanding when it comes to
safety issues in cars,” says C.P. (“Case”) van Dam, a
professor of mechanical and aeronautical engineering at
the University of California at Davis. “We expect
comfort and high performance.” The same expectations
have shaped pilots’ preferences in small aircraft, van
Dam notes, adding, “If you end up compromising in both
areas, do you really satisfy a large enough group of
people?”