When Is a Disability an Advantage?
Oscar Pistorius is an 18-year-old sprinter from
Pretoria, South Africa, whose ambition is to compete for
his nation in the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing.
His best time in the 200 meters is 21.97 seconds, about
two and a half seconds off the world mark. To compete at
the elite level, he obviously has quite a lot of work
ahead of him, even to qualify as his country's
representative. But he doesn't lack the will to do so.
Pistorius was born without feet and has fought
hard—with the help of skilled prosthetics engineers—to
get into a position even to consider running against the
world's best able-bodied athletes.
In "Born to Run," a Web-only feature on IEEE Spectrum
Online
(http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov05/2189),
author Marlowe Hood, of Agence France-Presse, writes
that Pistorius's quest has touched off a huge
controversy in the world of track. The high-tech
solution to Pistorius's disability has drawn criticism
as being an unfair advantage.
High-end 21st-century prosthetic devices are marvels
of technology and feature sophisticated human-machine
neural interfaces and muscle-like actuators. Electronic
knees with microprocessors are now able to recalibrate
1000 times per second.
"To what extent can Pistorius's jaw-dropping
performance be attributed to his innate talent and
determination, and to what extent is it a by-product of
technology?" Hood asks. "Even on technical grounds,
there is no clear answer. Factor in the fundamental
issue of fairness, and the waters get even muddier."
Hood spoke with a number of athletes, sports
officials, scientists, and engineers to investigate the
matter. His account is an insightful and
thought-provoking look at a phenomenon that most of us
have never heard of—or even imagined was possible.
The editorial content of IEEE Spectrum
does not represent official positions of the
IEEE or its organizational units. Please address
comments to Forum at
n.hantman@ieee.org.