The fall of the house of Enron
Ironically, the events that led directly to Enron's collapse had little
directly to do with its energy trading business. The beginning
of the end was the discovery in October 2001 by Wall Street
Journal reporters of some strange partnerships Enron's chief
financial officer, Andrew Fastow, had created, apparently
with his board's approval, in order to move debt off its public
books and boost its publicly reported profits. These special-purpose
entities, which happened to be hugely profitable to Fastow
personally, turned out to be the financial termites that ate
away Enron's foundation.
At a stroke, Enron's shocking downfall tore the blinders off regulators
and watchdogs, causing sudden sharp scrutiny of the entire
energy trading industry. First to be affected were the energy
traders themselves, the firms that buy and sell contracts
for electricity and gas in over-the-counter (off-exchange)
markets. These contracts are purely financial instruments,
derivatives that reflect the price of something else, such
as electricity, and are used to hedge against future losses
as prices change. It soon came to light that some of the biggest-name
firms in the business—Reliant Energy, CMS Energy, Dynegy—had
engaged in the fake transactions known variously as round-trip
or "wash" trades.
The financial markets now decided that energy and electricity trading was
risky business. The leading credit raters, Moody's, Standard
and Poor's, and Fitch, coming under criticism for not having
been skeptical enough in the salad days of trading, responded
harshly, downgrading not only the traders but also merchant
generators—companies that own generating plants and sell
the electricity into the competitive wholesale market.
Soon, only the distribution utilities still had investment-grade
bond ratings. But by fall 2002, even some of those came under
heavy attack, as the taint of Enron spread to almost every
company involved in making, selling, and distributing electricity.
Initially, only California's PG and E and Southern California
Edison had been in trouble, caught in regulatory pincers not
particularly of their making. Now, partly because electricity
trading was beginning to work better in many other parts of
the country and internationally, utility distributors and
merchant generators were seeing profits fall because prices
were coming down sharply.