Imagine sticking yourself with a pin on the pad of your finger up
to seven times a day. It's an unpleasant thought, but that
is exactly what many diabetics should be doing. Several large
clinical studies have shown that tight control of blood sugar
slows the progression and development of long-term complications
of diabetes, such as blindness and kidney failure. So sufferers
must collect multiple blood samples to provide feedback for
insulin dosing and other treatment.
Apart from the pain, though, tight control also introduces a risk
of severe hypoglycemia—blood sugar so low that it can
lead to coma or seizure.
The risk exists because tight control seeks to reduce the patient's
mean glucose levels to a more normal state, but from that
lower point there is a greater probability that glucose levels
could accidentally become dangerously low. To counter that
threat, new glucose-metering technologies that should provide
relatively painless and much safer blood sugar control are
entering the market.
New glucose monitors, like the model from Cygnus, derive
more measurements from fewer pinpricks.
Rushing to pull down the barriers to tight glucose control, several
firms have developed devices that all but eliminate the need
for blood samples. In June 1999, an implantable sensor providing
continuous readings, made by Medtronic MiniMed Inc. (Northridge,
Calif.), became the first alternative glucose monitor to gain
approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. And Cygnus
Inc. (Redwood City, Calif.) followed in March 2001 with its
own device, which monitors glucose continuously through the
skin.
While a great many innovative technologies have been proposed, only
a fraction are in advanced stages of development. They fall
into three categories: implantable monitors, transdermal (through
the skin) meters, and meters depending on spectroscopic methods.
Each is a far cry from the painful methods used over the last
several decades.
By offering greater convenience and less pain, the devices encourage people
to test more frequently, the extra testing providing previously
unobtainable information on trends in glucose levels in response
to insulin dosage and other treatments. Also, monitors that
provide frequent, automatic readings can be equipped with
preset alarms to warn the user of high or low glucose levels.
Parents of children with diabetes, for example, can be warned
of overnight low glucose, rather than having to wake up each
night to check their child's blood sugar. These advances will
lead to better decisions about treatment and ultimately reduce
the long-term medical complications of diabetes.