Solar-Cell Squabble Continued
By Peter Fairley
First Published April 2008
Photos: Left: National Renewable Energy
Laboratory; Right: Plextronics
|
UP CLOSE: A technician [left] at the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory measures the spectral response
of a photovoltaic device, which indicates how
sensitive it is to different hues of light.
Industry leader Plextronics subjects its organic
PV cells [right] to such independent evaluation,
but others contend that the practice is
expensive and time-consuming and that it stifles innovation.
|
Inorganic PV experts avoid such bickering through a
culture of independent verification: prior to
publishing, scientists and companies submit potentially
record-breaking cells to international reference labs,
including NREL, Germany's Fraunhofer Institute for Solar
Energy Systems, and Japan's National Institute of
Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, which offer
such services at no cost to the researchers. The
Materials
Today editorial urged the organic PV
community to adopt the same practice.
Easier said than done. The testing may be free, but
preserving the fragile cells while they're en route and
awaiting testing (a two- to eight-week queue at NREL)
can cost several thousand dollars. At a minimum, the
cells must be vacuum-packed. Better still is
encapsulating the cells in glass or protective
polymers—a sophisticated process that is beyond the
expertise and resources of most academic labs.
Verification advocates recognize the added challenge
but say that the interests of the community must
prevail. “We have sympathy, up to a point,” says Shawn
Williams, vice president of technology for Plextronics,
which does adhere to prepublication verification.
Especially with the industry approaching
commercialization, Williams says, record claims must be
“tempered” with certified results: “It's about
credibility. If people go out there and publish results
that are not substantiated, then we or anyone else who's
out there with real results get lost in the noise.”
Some influential academics agree. One is Niyazi Serdar
Sariciftci, a physicist at Austria's Johannes Kepler
University Linz who collaborated with Heeger on his
early PV research and whose work since then has helped
Konarka raise more than US $100 million to commercialize
organic PV. “In my opinion, every scientist has to go to
an accredited lab and certify the claimed efficiency,
particularly if the claim is for a world-record
efficiency,” Sariciftci says. “If it has never been
reproduced objectively, it does not exist for science.”
That kind of talk strikes others as elitist and
counterproductive. “It took years to reproduce the
Millikan oil-drop experiment. Therefore it didn't exist
to scientists?” Carroll asks, referring to physicist
Robert Millikan's famous 1910 experiment measuring the
electron's charge and the resulting acrimonious debate
that delayed Millikan's Nobel Prize by several years.
Carroll says that a verify-then-publish system would
thwart young researchers and other newcomers short on
funds and influence. “That's going to begin to narrow
down the number of people who are allowed to work and
publish,” he says. “Is that really what you want
happening at a time when we need to be exploring all
options in solar energy?”
Heeger echoes Carroll's last sentiment. He and others
who favor the publish-first, verify-later approach could
even point to one of Heeger's own early reports on
organic PV technology: a 1995 paper in Science
reporting a cell that, according to the authors,
delivered a conversion efficiency of 2.9 percent,
seemingly shattering the 1 percent ceiling that had
defined organic PV for a decade. Competitors quickly
recognized that a calculation error had more than
doubled the reported power output. Despite the mistake,
the paper continues to be heavily cited as a seminal
advance that pointed a path to the organic PV devices
now edging toward commercial readiness.
Heeger never issued a retraction and still makes no
apologies for the error. “Numbers are indeed important,”
he says. “But scientific advances that demonstrate and
enable quantum-step improvements are perhaps even more important.”
About the Author
PETER FAIRLEY frequently writes about energy for
IEEE Spectrum. In “Solar-Cell Squabble”, he covers
an ongoing controversy among organic photovoltaic
researchers. After interviewing people on all sides,
Fairley concluded that “discerning the real progress
happening in solar power from the hype ain't easy.”
To Probe Further
The home page for the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory’s device-performance group (http://www.nrel.gov/pv/measurements/device_performance.html)
has useful information about how it measures
photovoltaic cells.
Materials
Today’s November editorial on organic PV
testing, “The Value of Values,” is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70290-0.