Forum: Our Readers Write
First Published April 2007
Photo: Irex Technologies
|
“‘Deliverance?’ From what? Apparently, from
comfort” —Matthew W. Slate
Do Not Deliver
Perhaps I might be considered old-fashioned, but
“E‑Newspapers:
Digital Deliverance?” [News, February]
does not appear likely to deliver me to any place
where I would like to be.
I frequently spend a good part of my afternoons
downstairs in my office, on my computer, these days
organizing all the information necessary for my tax
returns, after having been driven substantially mad
by the complexities of Medicare, Part D. When I have
had enough, I come upstairs.
I sit in a lounge seat, with the back inclined to
about 20 degrees from plumb. To my right is a small
table with either a martini or a beer, and some
foodstuffs of which my cardiologist would disapprove
if I dared tell him.
I pick up either the day’s newspaper or a recent
magazine and read it, oblivious to the crumbs and
liquids that I am spilling on it. It will go to the
dump anyway, after I have clipped out anything of interest.
There is no way that I will touch any gadget more
complicated than the TV remote control, although
after dinner I may have recovered sufficiently to go
down and do a bit more work.
“Deliverance?” From what? Apparently, from comfort.
Matthew W. Slate
IEEE Life Member
Sudbury, Mass.
In the Wastelands
I read Peter Fairley’s article on reprocessing
nuclear waste [“Nuclear
Waste Land,” February] with interest
and thought it was well‑written and informative.
Nevertheless, I thought one statement was a little
misleading—about the loss of 83 cubic meters of
material over nine months at Sellafield. This loss
was identified by the operators and reported to the
safety authorities once it had been confirmed, not
the other way around. The material was collected in
a secondary containment cell and returned to the
process as specified by the plant design, and at no
time were plant personnel or the general public
subject to an increase in dose uptake as a result of
this lapse.
Certainly this was a failure in operation and
resulted in a fine. But to refer to this in the same
paragraph with a statement about accidents that
“polluted rivers and contaminated hundreds of
thousands of acres” could mislead your readers.
Joseph Wilkinson
IEEE Member
Whitehaven, England
The author responds: Sellafield’s operator, the
British Nuclear Group, rated its May 2005 discovery
of leaking spent fuel dissolved in nitric acid a
“serious incident” and immediately suspended
reprocessing. BNG did not receive a green light to
restart from UK regulators until this past January
and, as this issue went to press, the plant had yet
to do so.
There is one solution to permanent disposal of
nuclear waste that I have not seen publicly covered
in any article on disposal: dropping secure
canisters of waste into the ocean at a point where
the ocean’s crust is moving under the continental
crust. A submersible transport vehicle is proposed
that would carry the waste to a point where the STV
becomes molten and heavy atoms will slowly float to
the center of the earth.
David P. Perry
IEEE Life Senior Member
Pomona, Calif.
Mayday, Mayday
After reading “Manufacturing
Mayday” [News, January], I am concerned
over the decision to use aluminum wiring in the
Airbus A380. For safety reasons, there are three
issues. Many know aluminum is lightweight but do not
realize that at small diameters, it is prone to
fracture under vibration and stress.
A solution is to go to a large diameter, but that
causes significant space issues when you bundle many
wires together. The jointing to equipment becomes
another weak point as aluminum is not a noble metal
(the three noble metals and best conductors in order
are gold, silver, and then copper). Most data
equipment makes use of these metals as connectors,
because they are reliable and secure and meld
together as a result of their noble nature.
The design decisions around wiring may build in an
inherent flaw caused by high stress and vibration
compounded with jointing issues. The A380 is as
strong as its weakest point, and fixed wire cabling
is the “heart of the aircraft.” I am concerned that
this decision, which seems based on other factors
than safety, could cause a midair heart attack with
disastrous consequences.
Peter Charlton
Singapore
Correction
In “New
Tech, Old Fuel” [News, February],
“nitrous oxide” should have been nitrogen oxide. In
“The
Books That Made a Difference”
[Resources, March], the first name of
science‑fiction writer Alastair Reynolds was
misspelled. We regret the errors. —Ed.
Readers are invited to comment on material
published in IEEE Spectrum and on matters of
interest to engineering and technology
professionals. Letters do not represent the
opinions of the IEEE. Letters may be edited for
space and clarity. For more letters, see “…And
More Forum” at
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org.
Contact: Forum, IEEE Spectrum, 3 Park Ave., 17th
floor, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.; fax, + 1 212
419 7570; e-mail, n.hantman@ieee.org.
|