Augustine concedes it's "a fair question" whether the
concern over China and India is any more legitimate than
the worry about Japan was. "But I have to say that times
are different today," he explains. China and India have
embraced the free market and now "are copying our
technological methods." With regard to the resurgence of
the U.S. semiconductor industry, he says dryly, "The
competitor we were worried about then, Japan, imploded.
You can't go through life betting that your competitors
will implode."
Retired Merck and Co. Chairman R. Roy Vagelos, who
was responsible for making K12 math and science
education the No. 1 priority of the Augustine committee,
notes that the United States is producing 70 000
engineers a year, while China is producing 350 000. "It
is a matter of overall numbers and quality," he says,
explaining that too many K12 math and science teachers
are untrained in their subjects and are failing to
excite their students.
All three proposals—Bush's and the two from
Congress—would cost a considerable amount at a time
when the federal deficit in fiscal 2007 is projected to
be $354 billion. Samuel M. Rankin III, director of the
American Mathematical Society and chairman of the
Coalition for National Science Funding, says the
president's proposal to increase the NSF budget by 7.9
percent in 2007 is welcome, given the agency's flat
budgets of past years. But the $6 billion level the
president proposes for 2007 is well short of the $10
billion level Congress authorized for 2007 four years
ago. "We still need to do more," Rankin notes, to get to
the intended level.
Moreover, Rankin explains that the House and Senate
appropriations committees will be under intense pressure
to divert some of the money for the NSF to the National
Institutes of Health, in Bethesda, Md., whose budget
doubled in a recent five-year period but has since
suffered some squeezing. Bush's fiscal 2007 proposal
includes a reduction for the National Cancer Institute,
for example.
But even if basic science research budgets are
doubled in the next five years, Rankin worries about
what will happen after that period is over. He says an
NIH-like boom-or-bust funding approach plays havoc with
academic researchers, who never know when the funding
will stop. And when it does, a project often comes
crashing to a halt, without yielding the kinds of
research gains that require many years of patient,
careful research attention.
Deborah L. Wince-Smith is president of the Council on
Competitiveness, in Washington, D.C., which former
Hewlett-Packard Co. CEO John Young helped create in the
1980s after he wrote the "Here Come the Japanese" report
for President Ronald Reagan. Wince-Smith says the United
States must accelerate funding in frontier research and
make sure that U.S. children have the skills needed for
high-wage jobs. But national economic success depends on
more than just producing additional, better-educated
engineers, she adds. "It is just as important that we
ground our kids in art and music," she continues. "The
Soviet Union had the most scientists and engineers in
the world. But there was no creativity under that
system. You need a strong liberal arts education along
with math and science, because that pushes how we think,
how we look at the world."