28 April
2005—All over the industrialized world
people are getting fatter. Obesity rates in the United
States, for example, have ballooned from about 10
percent in the early 1960s to 30 percent in 2000. And
with obesity come a cohort of other health problems
including diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Though a
recent epidemiological study has cast doubt on how
deadly obesity really is—revising the number it kills
each year in the United States downward from 400 000 to
112 000—the risk is still enough to drive more than 100
000 obese people per year to seek a surgical solution.
Gastric bypass surgery is a radical remodeling of the
gut that reduces the stomach's volume and scales back a
person's ability to absorb nutrients. But the surgery
comes with a risk of complications—including death—and
it is irreversible. So a group of companies have set
about adapting that old standby of the medical device
industry, the pacemaker, to mimic the effects of gastric
bypass surgery—but reversibly, and with minimal surgery
or, in one case, none.
The concept attracted over US $40 million in venture
capital last year, and progress has been rapid. One
firm's device is approved for use in the European Union
and Canada, and the company, Transneuronix Inc., in Mt.
Arlington, N.J., recently finished enrolling hundreds of
patients in the trials it will use to gain approval in
the United States. The other companies plan trials in
humans starting this year.
The Transneuronix device is a pocket-watch-size
stimulator that is implanted beneath the skin of the
abdomen. Electrodes lead from the stimulator to the
stomach wall and deliver 4 to 12 bursts per minute of 2-
to 100-hertz pulses. The stimulator settings are
adjusted with a short-range wireless link similar to
those used to program pacemakers. In the last nine
years, more than 700 people have received the gastric
stimulator, and two years following the implantation on
average they had lost and maintained the loss of 35
percent of their excess weight—about half of what
gastric bypass surgery delivers. So far, no one has died
from the Transneuronix implant, and there have been no
major complications.
Representatives of Transneuronix would not comment for
this article, but according to published clinical
studies, patients with the device find it easier to
become sated and so do not eat as much. The electric
pulses are thought to disrupt the grinding motion of the
stomach, thus slowing digestion. In addition, recent
studies show that the stimulation alters the release of
certain hormones in such a way that a person would feel
full for a longer time.
This company clearly has the edge over its
competitors, but they will all soon start human trials,
and some are riding Transneuronix's clinical coattails.
Intrapace Inc., in Menlo Park, Calif., for one, is
developing a pacemaker that works in an almost identical
fashion. The only difference is that instead of having
the device surgically implanted, the patient, in effect,
swallows it. "One thing that was very obvious to us: the
stomach has wonderful access through the mouth," says
Intrapace CEO Mir Imran. The stimulator is pushed down
the throat using an endoscope and stitched to the inside
of the stomach wall. The electrode lead is then fixed to
the other side of the stomach. "Obesity therapy is an
elective procedure," notes Imran. "I firmly believe that
patients would be more attracted to simple outpatient
endoscopic procedures."
Intrapace had to rethink the pacemaker a bit for a
journey down the throat and a home inside the stomach.
"We really can't put a flat, hockey-puck-shaped device
down someone's throat," says Imran. So the stimulator
was engineered into a package about the size and shape
of a AA battery. The implant and its electrode leads
also required new materials to survive in the stomach's
acidic environment.
EnteroMedics Inc., in St. Paul, Minn. takes a
different approach: rather than stimulating the stomach
wall, its stimulator blocks traffic on the nerves that
penetrate the stomach. The device sends biphasic
electrical signals to the trunks of the vagus nerve just
as it enters the stomach. The signal forces the nerve's
cells into a state in which they cannot transmit
information either up from the stomach or down from the
brain. These signals are crucial to everything about
eating.
Ordinarily, when you begin a meal the brain tells the
stomach to slacken so it can accept more food. But with
the vagus nerve blocked, the signal never gets through,
and "you can't eat as much in one sitting," says Mark
Knudson, EnteroMedics CEO. The blockage also slows the
stomach's grinding motion, keeping food in the stomach
longer, and it suppresses the release of digestive
enzymes. With fewer digestive enzymes, less of the food
that does get eaten is absorbed. And finally, blocking
the vagus should mean no hunger pangs, as much of the
information about satiety travels along this nerve.
Though EnteroMedics has yet to do its first patient
testing, on 30 March it scored a partnership to develop
the device with one of the premier medical centers in
the world, the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
Another electronic implant hopeful is Metacure Ltd.,
in Tirat Carmel, a spinoff of Impulse Dynamics Israel
Ltd., which makes stimulators to treat heart failure.
Company executives refused an interview, but a
spokesperson said that Metacure is beginning trials in
humans. The obesity device is based on the electrical
stimulation technology that Impulse Dynamics uses to
increase the ability of heart muscle to contract. For a
matter of milliseconds immediately following a
heartbeat, the muscle is immune to attempts to
electrically trigger another beat. However, if a
biphasic pulse of current is applied to the muscle
during that time, calcium ions flow into its cells and
the amount it contracts increases. Metacure plans to use
similar stimulation in the stomach, though the company
would not specify how this would lead to weight loss.
Electrical stimulators aren't the only alternative to
gastric bypass surgery. Laproscopic banding, pinching
off part of the stomach with an inflatable plastic tube,
has been in use for several years. But it merely makes
the stomach smaller, leaving the absorption of food
unchanged. It also comes with its own set of
complications and leads to less weight loss than bypass
surgery. Other nonelectrical devices are in the works.
Start-up GI Dynamics Inc., in Watertown, Mass., is
developing one such device, though the company will not
describe it beyond confirming that it does not rely on
electrical stimulation.
If and when these devices go on the market they will
compete with surgery, each other, and drugs.
Enteromedics' Knudson thinks devices may have the edge
over drugs, at least. He notes that control of the gut
is very complex, involving as many as 25 different
neurochemical signals. A drug can typically act on only
one. "To find a magic pharmaceutical bullet is way off
in the future, if it will happen at all," he says.
And not all the devices may wind up in direct
competition. "There will ultimately be many different
types of patient populations and market niches," says GI
Dynamics' CEO Stuart A. Randle, adding that certain "new
therapies will work better in some than in others." At
this early stage, however, he says, no one knows who
those populations are.
While the rush to find electronic analogues of bypass
surgery has drawn a great deal of attention and private
funds, U.S. government scientists are trying to get
engineers to work on devices that can help keep people
from becoming obese in the first place.
At the core, weight problems are an imbalance between
how much you eat and how many calories you burn each
day. Abby G. Ershow, the nutrition program officer at
the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute in Bethesda,
Md., describes what is needed as "a magic wristwatch"
that can tell you when your caloric intake is out of
balance with your burn rate. "The trick is having
something that genuinely works, is easy to use, and can
be translated into how people can change their
behavior," says Ershow. Nothing like that exists today,
but Ershow is hoping some small business research
grants funded by the National Institutes of
Health will help technology move in that direction.